type-annotations build status

Werner Dietl wdietl at gmail.com
Thu Dec 20 13:11:23 PST 2012

Hi Steve,

thanks for the update!

> tools/javac/incompleteStatements/T8000484.java - has been noted before on
> this list
> This is code with incompete try-catch (or catch-notry as the case may be)
> and produces extra diagnostics with type-annotation builds and passes with
> jdk8 and lambda builds.

Fixed. I apparently made a merge mistake at some point.

> tools/javac/T8003967/DetectMutableStaticFields.java - The bug has been fixed
> in jdk8.
>   Bug:  http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8000484
>   It has failed the last 2 builds (12/17 and 12/20).
> Looks like 'targets' was changed to final in
> com/sun/tools/javac/code/TargetType.java after the code was duplicated into
> com/sun/tools/classfile/TypeAnnotation.java.

I also fixed this.

In addition, the TargetType tag should now correctly be a byte; it
previously was still a short.

Please let me know how this looks to you.
cu, WMD.

> On 12/19/2012 10:46 PM, Steve Sides wrote:
>> Hi Werner,
>> type-annotations builds kick off at 6am.  By the time I get in, testing
>> should be far enough along to have an idea.
>> If it looks okay, we can promote the build to java.net tomorrow. I'll let
>> you know.
>> -steve
>> On 12/19/2012 10:06 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
>>> I just pushed an update that makes NestedTypes pass, which was the
>>> last type-annotations related test that failed for me:
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/type-annotations/type-annotations/langtools/rev/e8b469961865
>>> Let me know whether those generic-location numbers sound right.
>>> I also pushed Joel's patch to add reflection support and pulled in all
>>> TL changes.
>>> Steve, how does the build look for you?
>>> If everything looks OK, this would be a good build to promote - it
>>> should be a usable snapshot.
>>> cu, WMD.


More information about the type-annotations-dev mailing list