javac crash for annotation on lambda formal parameter type
joel.franck at oracle.com
Wed Dec 11 02:41:36 PST 2013
On 2013-12-11, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote:
> >Since code from Attr is frequently used in other phases, have you
> >thought about the possibility to get into a racy situation, say if LTM
> >calls back into Attr in an unexpected way?
> Right now this is not happening, it's true that if there are changes
> in the future then this code may fail, but that's part of the
> process. I was thinking about using a weak hash map in Attr, but
> this approach is probably too much for a, for the moment, simple
There is always a risk something breaks in the future, I'm satisfied
with you having thought trough this.
More information about the type-annotations-dev