Idea how to implement VT/VO compatibility in JVM
stef at epardaud.fr
Thu Jan 22 14:34:01 UTC 2015
On 01/22/2015 03:30 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
> I don't quite get the elegance comment - there's already nothing
> elegant about heavy use of reflection. Yes, it gets the job done in
> some cases, but it's a minority use case (I hope!).
Well, IMO there's a lot more elegance in List<val Date> being an
instance of List<Object> (variance issues aside).
> Also, keep in mind that calling a Collection <?> taking method with
> value type collections may not be safe as the code in that method may
> be relying on Object semantics (e.g. locks on objects, compares
> reference identity, etc); in some ways it's safer to call any T
> methods because presumably person writing those is conscious of value
> types being a possibility and also compiler may warn if any
> assumptions are made about it being an Object.
Sure, except it needs to be possible to do ;)
More information about the valhalla-dev